🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.